Wealth Creation, Asset Protection, and Offshore Private Banking advice center

Instant Actionable Intelligence for Free + Thinking + Individuals
The Gold Report The Asset Protection Report 5 Day Offshore Course Everything

SEND ME
THE GOLD REPORT

SEND ME
THE ASSET PROTECTION REPORT

SEND ME
5 DAY OFFSHORE COURSE

SEND ME
EVERYTHING!
YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS:
Absolutely No Spam - Privacy is our Business

How to Open an Offshore Bank Account in Singapore

Filed Under (Uncategorized) by editor on 26-01-2010

Tagged Under : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

by Peter Macfarlane for The Q Wealth Report

Singapore is “a convenient destination to protect and add value to your international wealth” according to the website of one of the 205 banks operating in Singapore today. I couldn’t have put it better myself!

Singapore has developed in recent years into a sophisticated private banking and wealth management base for Asia. But besides targeting their traditional but fast growing market of wealthy entrepreneurs in Asia, the best offshore banks in Singapore today are also developing products and services tailored for North Americans, Europeans and Australians, including multi currency accounts.

If this sounds like you, read on to find out about some of the advantages and disadvantages of opening an offshore bank account in Singapore, and learn how to open an offshore bank account as a non-resident. Is Singapore the best offshore banking country for the new decade?

Typical investors from this latter group are looking for first-world banking services, delivered over the internet in English, in a country that is outside the zone of influence of the United States and the European Union.

One of the world’s most prosperous countries, Singapore today boasts a prominent financial centre and highly developed economy. Its flexible regulatory framework, independent judiciary and practical English-inspired legal system have become the foundations of the country’s success.

In common with most offshore financial centres, interest earned by individuals on bank deposits and foreign sourced income – including foreign sourced dividends received on non-Singaporeans securities – is exempt from Singapore taxes. Singapore also has no capital gains tax nor estate duty on bank deposits and investments.

Accounts can freely be maintained in all major currencies. These multi currency accounts provide an excellent hedge for those of us who foresee major devaluations of currencies like the dollar and the euro in the months and years ahead.

Accounts may also be opened in the name of foreign entities like corporations, trusts and LLCs, achieving even greater privacy and asset protection benefits, and sometimes legally sidestepping any requirement to report assets as personal holdings.

All these benefits are delivered in a strong bank secrecy regime, helping account holders to protect their investments from prying eyes inside or outside the country. Banking secrecy in Singapore is not just laid down by law, but is part of the national business culture. Indeed, tax authorities in Singapore are specifically blocked from having any access to individual bank accounts.

As in Asia in general, a lot of business in Singapore has traditionally been carried out in cash. This is epitomised by the $10,000 bill, the largest bank note in the world: at current exchange rates (January 2010) one of these bills is worth more than seven thousand US dollars. These days, however, as restrictions on cash are becoming tighter, sophisticated internet banking is becoming the norm.

So, if you are not resident in Singapore how can you access these banking services? Everything starts with opening a basic current, savings or checking account – the basis of your banking relationship.

One of the disadvantages of banking in Singapore is that you will need to go there to open an account. Banking regulations do not permit the opening of accounts by mail, unless the client is already known to the bank. The only possible exception to this is opening an account at one of the many banks in Singapore that send officers to visit their wealthier clients in their overseas homes, or have associated offices in other countries. HSBC clients, for example, may be able to open accounts at HSBC in Singapore via their local offices. The above process, however, is not advisable if banking secrecy is important to you – since it leaves permanent records of your accounts accessible in other jurisdictions. In any case I always recommend visiting at least once so you can get to know your banker personally.

Apart from that, opening your account should be relatively straightforward. There are few complications. If you choose one of the commercial banks such as DBS Bank or United Overseas Bank, a few hundred dollars will be enough to open an account. If you want a higher level of personal service and are prepared to make a higher deposit, let’s say over a hundred thousand dollars or equivalent (bank policies vary widely), contact one of the more discreet private banking operations. I recommend you go for one of the lower profile ones, since they tend to offer the best privacy protection.

A full list of banks operating in Singapore is available on Wikipedia, and you can contact them directly. It is always easier, however, if you have an introduction from a regulated professional who is known to the bank, such as a lawyer, accountant or company formation agent. My firm can help with that, for example, if you are a Q Wealth member. Membership costs just $87 so won’t break the bank!

In terms of documentation needed to open an offshore account, you will be expected to provide proof of who you are (a copy of your passport), where you live (such as a utility bill) and most importantly of all, proof that the funds come from a legitimate source. For example, if the funds you are depositing were obtained from a real estate sale or from an inheritance, you would show the relevant legal documents to prove this. Finally, it is advisable to take a letter of reference from your bankers at home, introducing you as a responsible account holder. This bank reference may be addressed ‘to whom it may concern.’


Note: Peter Macfarlane is editor of the Practical Offshore Banking Guide, an annually updated guide available free to readers of The Q Wealth Report. If you haven’t got yours yet, sign up today to access this information.

The future of Swiss Private Banking looks better than ever

Filed Under (Asset and Wealth Protection, Offshore and Private Banking) by editor on 08-08-2009

Tagged Under : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

by Peter Macfarlane, Joint Editor

Most continental Europeans like to take an extended vacation in August. But for those of us in the offshore banking and asset protection business, that just hasn’t been possible this year. I’ve also been relatively quiet in terms of my blogs recently, but it’s not because I’ve been on holiday. Quite the opposite. I’ve been beavering a way at full inboxes and stacks of paperwork from clients. In fact, business this August has been busier than most busy months in other years. It seems people are finally getting the message. Your assets are safer offshore! This in spite of a huge publicity campaign suggesting the opposite and backed by all the media resources the government could muster.

One of the main focuses has been the war of words this summer between Switzerland and the United States. But what practicaln implications does this have for those who already have Swiss bank accounts, or for those who are considering opening a Swiss account for the first time? That is what I will examine in this article.

Last week we heard the news from Swiss private banking giant UBS that they had finally reached agreement with the US IRS. Of course, nobody seriously expected a banking, watches and chocolate trade war – an agreement had to be made after appropriate posturing for a while on both sides. The terms of the agreement are still unclear – probably as part of a face-saving exercise for the IRS. My guess is they really didn’t get much actual data on account holders. Maybe a few thousand blatant tax evaders who had been stupid and lazy enough to evade taxes by holding assets in their personal names in undeclared accounts were turned over. If these people had been following our advice from even ten years ago they wouldn’t have had a problem!

However, the IRS got exactly what they set out to get in the first place. This case wasn’t really about information at all. It was about publicity.

Appropriately for those who speak with forked tongues, the IRS sent out a two-pronged warning message: first, to the US public and the world at large, that ‘Big Brother’ doesn’t approve of offshore banking. Thousands of American citizens with accounts at UBS suffered a lot of sleepless nights, and perhaps quite a few have decided to ‘turn themselves’ in anyway via the current tax amnesty arrangements even though their information never had been revealed and never would be. That is why it is so important, if you want to go offshore, to make sure you have access to the right information (shameless plug for our services here!) Those Americans who still believe and trust their own government – a fast shrinking minority – might be dissuaded from opening further offshore accounts.

The other prong of the IRS war of words was a message to Swiss banks, and to a lesser extent offshore banks in general. Banks across Switzerland and elsewhere have been busy closing the accounts of US citizens, based on ‘policy decisions.’ This again, of course, was part of the IRS’ plan all along. Other banks and governments have been taking note too: for example I’ve been hearing reports from Singapore and Hong Kong of banks closing offshore accounts belonging to Australian citizens, as the Australian government is showing of every sign of stepping up the attacks… probably emboldened by the success of the IRS publicity machine.

UBS was taught a lesson. An interesting article in this week’s Economist entitled Offshore Private Banking: Bourne to Survive, “UBS has been haemorrhaging funds, with an outflow of SFr30 billion ($28 billion) so far this year. But the country’s next four biggest listed banks, Credit Suisse among them, have had private-bank inflows of SFr31 billion.” A point of the Economist article is that people have abandoned the bank (UBS) but not the country or the concept.

Another of the Economist’s points is that most people are not actually in Swiss banks for tax reasons. I’ve long written that tax stopped being the major factor in driving people offshore years ago. Sure, people don’t like to hand over half of the fruits of their labour to the state. I can understand that and I’m sure you can too. But in the bigger picture, it is the distrust of big government that is driving people to protect their wealth offshore.

Tax, just like say electricity or salaries, is an expense people will pay if the environment for doing business is right. It would be a stupid person who would lose 100% of something just to save 50% of it. But what governments don’t get is that they have to make the whole business environment attractive. And the way the government should do this? Just keep their noses out of people’s private business and lives!

As more and more business can be done from anywhere on the planet, why would people stay in a hostile business environment? It’s not just money that economies like the USA, UK and Australia are haemorrhaging at the moment. It’s the smart people like you and me who follow the money.

These days as the Economist says, banking clients are  “mainly in Switzerland for its political stability and well-run banks.” (Since early 2007, 135 banks have “imploded” in the USA, but not one in Switzerland) Nothing to do with taxes. They are trying to escape an unhealthy business environment with factors like inflation, devaluation, bank collapses, civil asset forfeitures and the like.

Why oh why then, and this pains me… would people move their assets into the four largest banks? I’m on record as saying Credit Suisse will likely be the next target. It may be this year, or next year, I don’t know. But Credit Suisse already agreed, for example, to some information exchange with the French government. If you are a new reader here, I invite you to explore this blog and the related articles and you’ll find some of my advice on alternatives to UBS for Swiss private banking. For example my articles on the Best and Safest Offshore Banks and Countries and Alternatives to Swiss Banks for Wealth Management.

The bottom line, however, is that there are better alternatives than big Swiss banks like UBS and Credit Suisse for your offshore accounts – whether you are looking for an active business account, an online trading account, or a more hands-off style traditional Swiss wealth management account. If you would like to know more, that is what we are here for. Our membership costs just $87 per year and entitles you to immediate access to a number of informative downloads – for example our recently updated Practical Offshore Banking Guide. If you are not yet a member, go ahead and sign up right now. Or if you are not yet ready to make that commitment,  sign up for our Free Five Part Course on Offshore Banking and Asset Protection first of all to get a feel for our material…

Anyway… I’ve gone on long enough, but for sure we will be hearing more about this topic. A lot more! I’m just on the way over to Panama City, Panama now and will shortly be reporting more from there on some interesting developments in the way the Panamanian government and banking system is handling the heavy-handed OECD and G20 threats. If you would like to receive this update on the offshore scene in Panama, sign up for our special Free Panama Offshore Report and I’ll be sure to get it to you. There’s no charge – all you need to give us is your e-mail address!

Switzerland or Singapore for Private Offshore Banking?

Filed Under (Offshore and Private Banking) by editor on 15-07-2009

Tagged Under : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A lot of readers have been asking me lately about offshore banking and wealth management opportunities in Singapore. Unquestionably, Singapore has some very sophisticated banks and bankers, and it has developed a well-earned reputation for discretion and confidentiality.

However I found the following observation on an internet discussion group, that I found interesting:

“Switzerland said it would seize UBS AG data to prevent the U.S. Justice Department from pursuing a U.S. court order seeking the identities of 52,000 American account holders in a crackdown on tax evaders.”

“The Swiss government “will use its legal authority to ensure that the bank cannot be pressured to transmit the information illegally, including if necessary by issuing an order taking effective control of the data at UBS that is the subject of the summons,” according to the filing.”

————————-

“The Singapore government is proposing changes to its tax laws to meet demands from the U.S. and Europe to clamp down on bank secrecy.

“Singapore will seek to amend its domestic laws to allow it to extend further cooperation on information exchange” via double-taxation agreements with other countries, the Finance Ministry said in a statement.  It is seeking public comments through July 28 on the amendments.”

So, how can we interpret these two news items?

First of all, they both have to be taken in context. While it’s good to see Switzerland sticking up for its sovereignty, we have always recommended clients against doing business with big, international banks like UBS or Credit Suisse. Iwas hardly surprising that UBS were targeted, given their large US presence that makes them something of a sitting duck. We have numerous articles about the Right Way to do Swiss bank accounts (Cantonal Banks, for example), and our Practical Offshore Banking Guide includes contact details of other recommended sources for private banking in Europe (not necessarily Switzerland).

Singapore is a place we’ve never done a lot of banking business with, and the quotation above goes some way toward explaining our reticence. But we full admit that our geographic bias when it comes to banking is more towards Europe and Latin America. Singapore is certainly convenient for Asians and Australasians, due to time zones, languages and culture. On the other hand, it would have to be up there with Hong Kong at the top of the hit list for say the Aussie tax authorities, who are getting more and more agressive these days.

But is banking in Singapore and Hong Kong such a good idea for Europeans and North Americans? In my view, probably not. Both the EU (particularly the UK) and the USA have quite strong influences there, and neither of these entities are friends of offshore banking. Canadians might be OK in Singapore. If you are interested in banking in Asia, then World Offshore Banks has some intriguing services worth exploring.

Generally, the rule is that convenience is a threat to privacy. If you are looking for the most private, best offshore bank for you, you want to be as far away as possible – both geographically and culturally – from your home country and the places where your fellow countrymen do their offshore banking. Europeans might do well in Latin American havens like Panama and Uruguay. North Americans might do well still in obscure corners of Europe.

Whatever you decide, remember that nothing is for ever. You need to monitor the situation and changes taking place in the world of offshore finance. It pays to work with banks that are nimble enough to help you with this. We can recommend a few. And The Q Wealth Report is here to help you with offshore banking advice and recommendations. If you haven’t yet signed up for our Free Offshore Banking and Asset Protection course, I would recommend you do so!

by Peter Macfarlane for The Q Wealth Report

Privacy policy Copyright notice Contact information International Wealth Creation Offshore Bank and Brokerage Accounts
    The Secrets of the Super-Rich

Finance Top Academics blogs
 
Dise�o web por LoQueQuierasYA.com
 
Subscribe to Rss Feed:   Rss