| |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
Wealth Creation, Asset Protection, and Offshore Private Banking advice center |
|
Filed Under (Uncategorized) by editor on 03-03-2010
Ignorance is bliss – until problems occur…
The first reports of shooting came just before midnight. Within minutes, heavy explosions, muffled by the distance, echoed through the steel and glass canyons of the capital. Then the noise died down.
At the second-floor window of a room in the Marriott Hotel, this reporter and two others were listening for more sounds of fighting when they saw a man wearing a black ski mask and camouflage pants and carrying an automatic assault rifle running across a patio area outside.
The reporters crouched to the floor, but the gunman spotted them. ‘Out! Out!’ He Shouted
”Out! Out!” he shouted, aiming his AK-47 assault rifle.
Which Marriott Hotel is the New York Times talking about here? Kabul? Baghdad? No, Panama, just a little over twenty years ago. You can read the full article here.
In the gilded lobby of the luxury hotel, Panama City’s finest, seven other gunmen had herded together about 80 guests and staff members. They were forced to lie face down with their arms outstretched.
”Who’s American?” several of the gunmen shouted at once. ”Americans over there.” The gunmen pushed a group of 11 into an adjacent section of the lobby.
You know we at Q Wealth are pretty positive on Panama. Many times I’ve been in that lobby for meetings with clients. But the point is, you have to be prepared. Recent geopolitical events over relatively insignificant territories have highlighted the risk and instability of the world we live in.
Who would have thought just a month or two ago of territorial disputes involving the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Argentina having a major effect on the global economy and politics? Surely, these are relatively stable countries, not be compared with Afghanistan or Iraq?
Yet our memories are short. Back in 1982 nearly 1000 lives were lost in the Falklands War. And, seemingly all of a sudden, tensions are heating up again in the region. Unsurprisingly, it has something to do with oil.
Venezuela, meanwhile, has had territorial ambitions over the Netherlands Antilles off its coast for years. And, as money launderer turned bank compliance officer Kenneth Rijock points out in this article, Hugo Chavez has just recently directly threatened the status of the Dutch Caribbean possessions of Aruba, Bonaire and Curacao, as well as the United States Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The Netherlands is in no position to defend these islands and there is the added potential flashpoint that comes from the fact that US military aircraft are based in these islands.
The Libyan government, meanwhile, has recently banned entry into their country of all nationals of Schengen countries (most of the European Union, excluding UK and Ireland). Just like that. I didn’t even see it on the mainstream news. It’s something Canada does from time to time as well. Most recently with just 48 hours’ notice they suddenly started demanding visas from Mexicans and Czechs. Those who already had flights booked were left to solve the problem themselves.
The fact is that disputes like these, that can only really be described as silly, can pop up almost anywhere at any time. They could turn out to be just what politicians on all sides need to rally popular support and distract the slumbering masses from the real serious problems.
The most important lesson is the need for geographic diversification. This kind of thing happens all the time and it could affect you or your assets. You shouldn’t keep all your assets in one place. You should get a second passport. You also need to keep your finger on the pulse and follow serious news sources that cover geopolitical matters. Stratfor is good, or for quick reading check out Sovereign Man.
Lots of Americans are buying land in Argentina at the moment. Now I’m not saying the following is likely, but neither is it so far-fetched…. What if a new Falklands War breaks out and the US steps in on the British side? How will the US and Britain being at war with Argentina affect investments, freedom to travel, and most importantly security of those expats?
“What if” is something people need to be asking themselves a lot these days. We live in a very unstable world. There is no 100% security. Little, insignificant disputes between politicians can spill over into making life hell for ordinary people. And then there are the relationships between China, the USA, and Russia…
In real estate, people talk about the three factors: location, location, and location. In offshore and asset protection planning, I talk about the same three factors. Diversification, diversification and diversification. Never keep all your assets in the same place, the same currencies or the same asset form.
Things change fast. Back in 1989, Miami was a safe place for Latin Americans to keep money. Now it isn’t. Panama has taken over that role and is stable.
Once again, the lesson is: be prepared. There is no 100% security anywhere. If you and your assets are mobile and ready with flags of convenience like offshore IBCs/corporations, foreign multi currency bank accounts, and second passports, you will be safer if severe crisis hits. And be sure to subscribe to Q Wealth Report where we write about such matters and – even more importantly – solutions, detailed plans and strategies. If you are not yet a subscriber and want to see the package of benefits you are missing out on, click here.
by Peter Macfarlane, Joint Editor
Most continental Europeans like to take an extended vacation in August. But for those of us in the offshore banking and asset protection business, that just hasn’t been possible this year. I’ve also been relatively quiet in terms of my blogs recently, but it’s not because I’ve been on holiday. Quite the opposite. I’ve been beavering a way at full inboxes and stacks of paperwork from clients. In fact, business this August has been busier than most busy months in other years. It seems people are finally getting the message. Your assets are safer offshore! This in spite of a huge publicity campaign suggesting the opposite and backed by all the media resources the government could muster.
One of the main focuses has been the war of words this summer between Switzerland and the United States. But what practicaln implications does this have for those who already have Swiss bank accounts, or for those who are considering opening a Swiss account for the first time? That is what I will examine in this article.
Last week we heard the news from Swiss private banking giant UBS that they had finally reached agreement with the US IRS. Of course, nobody seriously expected a banking, watches and chocolate trade war – an agreement had to be made after appropriate posturing for a while on both sides. The terms of the agreement are still unclear – probably as part of a face-saving exercise for the IRS. My guess is they really didn’t get much actual data on account holders. Maybe a few thousand blatant tax evaders who had been stupid and lazy enough to evade taxes by holding assets in their personal names in undeclared accounts were turned over. If these people had been following our advice from even ten years ago they wouldn’t have had a problem!
However, the IRS got exactly what they set out to get in the first place. This case wasn’t really about information at all. It was about publicity.
Appropriately for those who speak with forked tongues, the IRS sent out a two-pronged warning message: first, to the US public and the world at large, that ‘Big Brother’ doesn’t approve of offshore banking. Thousands of American citizens with accounts at UBS suffered a lot of sleepless nights, and perhaps quite a few have decided to ‘turn themselves’ in anyway via the current tax amnesty arrangements even though their information never had been revealed and never would be. That is why it is so important, if you want to go offshore, to make sure you have access to the right information (shameless plug for our services here!) Those Americans who still believe and trust their own government – a fast shrinking minority – might be dissuaded from opening further offshore accounts.
The other prong of the IRS war of words was a message to Swiss banks, and to a lesser extent offshore banks in general. Banks across Switzerland and elsewhere have been busy closing the accounts of US citizens, based on ‘policy decisions.’ This again, of course, was part of the IRS’ plan all along. Other banks and governments have been taking note too: for example I’ve been hearing reports from Singapore and Hong Kong of banks closing offshore accounts belonging to Australian citizens, as the Australian government is showing of every sign of stepping up the attacks… probably emboldened by the success of the IRS publicity machine.
UBS was taught a lesson. An interesting article in this week’s Economist entitled Offshore Private Banking: Bourne to Survive, “UBS has been haemorrhaging funds, with an outflow of SFr30 billion ($28 billion) so far this year. But the country’s next four biggest listed banks, Credit Suisse among them, have had private-bank inflows of SFr31 billion.” A point of the Economist article is that people have abandoned the bank (UBS) but not the country or the concept.
Another of the Economist’s points is that most people are not actually in Swiss banks for tax reasons. I’ve long written that tax stopped being the major factor in driving people offshore years ago. Sure, people don’t like to hand over half of the fruits of their labour to the state. I can understand that and I’m sure you can too. But in the bigger picture, it is the distrust of big government that is driving people to protect their wealth offshore.
Tax, just like say electricity or salaries, is an expense people will pay if the environment for doing business is right. It would be a stupid person who would lose 100% of something just to save 50% of it. But what governments don’t get is that they have to make the whole business environment attractive. And the way the government should do this? Just keep their noses out of people’s private business and lives!
As more and more business can be done from anywhere on the planet, why would people stay in a hostile business environment? It’s not just money that economies like the USA, UK and Australia are haemorrhaging at the moment. It’s the smart people like you and me who follow the money.
These days as the Economist says, banking clients are “mainly in Switzerland for its political stability and well-run banks.” (Since early 2007, 135 banks have “imploded” in the USA, but not one in Switzerland) Nothing to do with taxes. They are trying to escape an unhealthy business environment with factors like inflation, devaluation, bank collapses, civil asset forfeitures and the like.
Why oh why then, and this pains me… would people move their assets into the four largest banks? I’m on record as saying Credit Suisse will likely be the next target. It may be this year, or next year, I don’t know. But Credit Suisse already agreed, for example, to some information exchange with the French government. If you are a new reader here, I invite you to explore this blog and the related articles and you’ll find some of my advice on alternatives to UBS for Swiss private banking. For example my articles on the Best and Safest Offshore Banks and Countries and Alternatives to Swiss Banks for Wealth Management.
The bottom line, however, is that there are better alternatives than big Swiss banks like UBS and Credit Suisse for your offshore accounts – whether you are looking for an active business account, an online trading account, or a more hands-off style traditional Swiss wealth management account. If you would like to know more, that is what we are here for. Our membership costs just $87 per year and entitles you to immediate access to a number of informative downloads – for example our recently updated Practical Offshore Banking Guide. If you are not yet a member, go ahead and sign up right now. Or if you are not yet ready to make that commitment, sign up for our Free Five Part Course on Offshore Banking and Asset Protection first of all to get a feel for our material…
Anyway… I’ve gone on long enough, but for sure we will be hearing more about this topic. A lot more! I’m just on the way over to Panama City, Panama now and will shortly be reporting more from there on some interesting developments in the way the Panamanian government and banking system is handling the heavy-handed OECD and G20 threats. If you would like to receive this update on the offshore scene in Panama, sign up for our special Free Panama Offshore Report and I’ll be sure to get it to you. There’s no charge – all you need to give us is your e-mail address!
Filed Under (Uncategorized) by editor on 26-06-2009
If you’ve been studying the offshore and asset protection arena for a little while, you might well have heard a lot of good things about the strong privacy benefits of the Panamanian Private Interest Foundation. As an asset protection and estate planning vehicle, it’s second to none.
Most of my consulting clients who choose this vehicle are seeking to create a legal structure that will reduce tax liabilities, protect their hard-earned assets from lawsuits or claims, and make sure that on death, their estates pass to their chosen beneficiaries without unnecessary legal disputes or fees.
The Panama foundation is based on the legendary Liechtenstein Foundation or Anstalt, the preferred wealth management choice of generations of continental Europeans. But it is not so well known or understood in the English speaking world. And these days, Panama offers better offshore secrecy and confidentiality than Liechtenstein.
You might well have Googled a few websites and read articles about Panama Foundations in rather confusing terms. Such articles are often written up either by internet marketers who have little idea about law, or by Panamanian lawyers who have little idea about Anglo-American common law and whose first language is not English.
But few people understand what kind of legal animal a Panama foundation really is. That’s probably a very good thing for those of us using them! The difficulty for many clients is of course deciding upon the best course of action or structure to use. But I am about to let you in on the secret… my new free report sets out to demystify the Panama Foundation, explain the concept in plain English, and explain the differences between a Foundation and a Trust of the Anglo-American variety.
Should you set up a Corporation… or a Foundation? Or both? You will find the answers in my latest report specifically about Foundations. It’s called “Panama Foundations: Use and Benefits Manual” and subtitled ‘Panama Foundations and Trusts Demystified.’
Once again, this report is FREE OF CHARGE. I will explain below how you can obtain your copy.
But what exactly is a Foundation? A Panama Foundation combines some of the best parts of a trust, and the best parts of an IBC or Offshore Company into one legal entity. A Foundation is typically set up to passively hold assets like bank accounts, stocks and shares, and real estate.
The key thing is that, unlike corporations, Foundations do not have owners. They have beneficiaries instead (for example, your heirs). The interesting thing about this is that in most countries it legally sidesteps reporting requirements.
Even in the USA, there are ways you can structure a Panama Foundation to legally avoid IRS reporting requirements. Because US tax law doesn’t specifically recognize Foundations, it is quite flexible on this – you decide how to declare your Foundation. (This only applies to US taxpayers. Other nationalities have it much easier…)
In my report I also explain the ultimate asset protection strategy… by keeping the assets in another country on another continent, you are protected not just by strict Panamanian secrecy and asset protection laws, but by something even stronger… what somebody doesn’t know, they can’t tell. You can make sure that your Foundation are structured so there is absolutely no record held in Panama of what the assets are and where they are located.
This new report, free of charge to registered Q Wealth members covers five topics. You will learn:
- What is a Panama Foundation. What is the difference between a trust and a Foundation, and why is a Foundation often more secure and private than a trust?
- Panama Foundations for Estate and Inheritance Planning
- Panama Foundations as an Asset Protection tool
- Banking for Panama Foundations
- Taxation of Panama Foundations
As always, I’ve kept things simple. This report is written in plain English, designed to explain legal concepts in simple terms. It is not an in-depth legal textbook…. But it has been reviewed by both Panamanian and British lawyers.
This report on Panama Foundations could be yours free in the next five minutes or so. All I ask in return is that, if you’ve not already done so, you sign up as a full member of The Q Wealth Report. You will be granted instant access to the Members’ Only section where you will be able to download this report in pdf format. Of course, if you’re already a QWR member you’re ahead of the game – just log in as usual and you can download it right now.
Of course, this brand new report is only one of the many benefits you will receive as a Q Wealth member. We’re not just about Panama – we’re focused on protecting and creating wealth internationally. We do all the hard work, costly research and due diligence for you – to take you from the overload of the information age directly to where you need to be. As a publishing company, not an offshore services provider, we deliver impartial advice from a global perspective – not biased advice from a Central American perspective, which is what you might well find elsewhere. Need I say more?
As a member you’ll also have access, for example, to the Practical Offshore Banking Guide, the report on buying and holding Precious Metals offshore, a report on Due Diligence on High Yield Investment Programs, and much much more… including the free consultation benefit I mentioned above. You’ll also receive every quarter our flagship publication, The Q Wealth Report.
All this, for less than a good lawyer would probably charge just for talking to you and giving you a fraction of this information. $87 per year to be precise. And if you are not 100% satisfied, you can cancel your subscription at any time and request a full refund. No quibbles, no questions asked.
To sign up right now you just need a Visa, Mastercard, American Express, JCB or Discover card. (If you prefer you can also download a mail-in subscription form to pay by cheque or money order)
Sign up online right now at http://www.qwealthreport.com/signup.php
Kind regards,
Peter Macfarlane
Offshore Banking Consultant and Joint Q Wealth Editor
P.S. Don’t forget we also offer separately an absolutely free report on the Hidden Truths Behind Panama Banking and Corporations. You can obtain the Banking and Corporations report without any need to sign up even. If you haven’t got yours yet, get it at the link above.
It probably won’t have escaped you that, although we are a global wealth building and wealth management newsletter with our roots in the United Kingdom, in recent years we have developed a distinct Latin American bias. That is no accident.
It is in Latin America that we have found freedom, wealth, and privacy – in the form of governments that have no particular interest in keeping the residents of their countries under surveillance. They say power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. Well it seems to us that Latin American governments have power, but not absolute power – because their systems are less developed than those further north. So the fact that these governments don’t have the financial resources to employ high-tech methods of spying on their citizens is certainly a blessing.
The Republic of Panama stands out in Latin America as a major offshore tax haven and financial hub. Offshore bank accounts, IBCs (Panama Corporations), Private Interest Foundations and other similar privacy tools make for a business-friendly environment. The recently elected Martinelli government promises to continue with Panama’s liberal economy at least for the next five years (whether conservatives hold power after that will depend on whether Martinelli can deliver on his promises.)
But besides being a good place to incorporate or open bank accounts, Panama is a very liveable place. Sophisticated capital Panama City has some beautiful areas and, despite a real estate boom in recent years, remains relatively inexpensive. You can still get a good meal with a local beer for $5. But if you want to pay $100 for a top-class trendy sushi dinner, you can do that too. You have the choice.
Banking services in Panama are getting better too. Traditionally Panamanian banks have had a ‘take it or leave it’ approach to new business, and pressure from the US has made it particularly difficult for US citizens and residents to open bank accounts in Panama. One of my favorite articles about Panama banks is here. In the last year or so I have seen this changing, with more product differentiation and even something that’s never been seen before – Panamanian banks such as Multibank (the locally owned bank formerly known as Multi Credit Bank) and London-based international giant HSBC competing with each other agressively in the local market, trying also to steal away market share from more expat-oriented banks like Credicorp.
So these days, it is getting easier to open bank accounts, customer service is getting better (think shorter lines in bank branches), and probably most importantly for our global readership, internet banking and credit/debit card services are becoming much more developed.
One of my clients, for example, now has an airline miles credit card linked to his Panama company account and spends tens of thousands of dollars every month buying goods for resale all over the world. The goods move through the Colon Free Trade Zone and are sold on worldwide. The credit card works in US dollars without surcharges, allows 30-50 days interest free credit, and as a bonus my client can fly almost anywhere he wants to go for free, using the miles accumulated.
At the same time, Panama banking privacy is good, and the country is one of the few that still allows offshore corporations with bearer shares, much to the chagrin of the G20. But they can’t say too much because Panama has one huge strategic card to play – the canal – which the Chinese would happily buy up at any time. But that’s another story…
Further resources: Peter Macfarlane has authored an e-book entitled “EIGHT IMPORTANT THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT GOING OFFSHORE IN PANAMA THAT YOUR LAWYER MAY NOT TELL YOU!” You can obtaihn this ebook free, right here and now, simply by visiting our Panama Banking for Corporations and Foundations page. You’ll also find further information on banking in Panama together with a range of other worldwide financial centres in our Practical Offshore Banking Guide.
|
 |
|
|