Frank. When I think of America I always keep a pocket of optimism alive somewhere in my soul. To be honest, I think this bill [the Healthcare bill] is the straw that breaks the camel´s back. We are already technically insolvent, and yet keep inventing ways to spend money (and raise taxes). This Healthcare bill precedes a debt downgrade, massive inflation, and the demise of the dollar. What was likely to happen is now written in stone. Seeing what is ahead, I am now afraid.

This article by Frank R. Suess is reproduced by kind permission of BFI’s Mountain Vision newsletter.

HIRE, FATCA, QFFI – BEWARE OF RAMPANT LAWS IN RESPONSE TO RAMPANT SPENDING

My friend´s concerns in the quote above are a reflection of the concerns and fears many of you may be experiencing these days. Here at BFI, we get numerous e-mails and comments that express a growing concern over government insolvency, debt, inflation and the increasing fiscal repression found in most of the G7 countries.

Indeed, over the past few weeks, an amazing sequence of laws, treaties and acts have been put in place to facilitate more deficit spending and more big brother powers. None of these laws enhance your liberties. None of them are aimed at protecting fundamental rights of freedom, property, or privacy. None of them enforce government fiscal discipline and accountability. On the contrary, they are tailored toward a continuation of out-of-control Keynesian madness — more public spending, more deficits, more debt, and of course, more taxation.

Instead of fixing fiscal and monetary issues at their roots, an internationally concerted crusade against ‘tax evaders´ and ‘offshore investment strategies´ has been launched. However, what may be considered as enforcement of law has long become a game of capital controls, protectionism and taxation horror.

In the UK, for instance, as part of the UK 2010 Budget, the British government last week decided to come down yet a little harder on offshore tax evasion. Penalties for offshore evasion were increased to a maximum of 200% of the unpaid tax. Penalties of up to 150% will apply where exchange of information is on a “upon request” basis rather than automatic. The stiffest penalties apply where non-compliance arises in jurisdictions that have not signed exchange information agreements with the UK.

Meanwhile, in Germany, the Anti-Tax Evasion Act was passed. This Act, approved by the German Federal Council, entails new regulations that deal with tax evasion and “unfair tax practices” (translation: low-tax jurisdictions with healthy balance sheets, such as Switzerland). Even in Israel, the Parliament permanently approved regulations for “enhanced” reporting requirements, as well as regulations against “aggressive” tax planning measures.

Finally, the worst — and most amazing — law of all was passed in the US under the very marketable title (you have to give them that) of ‘HIRE´. I briefly discussed this phenomenal law and particularly its section on foreign accounts in the last Mountain Vision Update.

After reviewing HIRE again and thoroughly studying its implications, I am convinced this law could actually be a blessing. I will tell you why in just a moment. But first, a bit more background…

HIRE – or simply another layer of hidden capital controls

Last month, President Obama signed into law possibly the “worst bill ever” (Wall Street Journal, November 1, 2009). Some predict that it will inevitably lead to full-scale socialized medicine. Then, shortly after the Health Care Bill had passed, Obama slipped in another silent bomb.

On March 18th, with little if any pomp and circumstance — downright unnoticed by most — he signed off on the US$ 17.5 billion ‘Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act´ (H.R. 2487), in brief ‘HIRE´. Amidst a long mire of legal gibberish that few would ever bear the pain of reading, provisions on ‘Foreign Account Tax Compliance´ (FATCA) were hidden.

With these provisions, the noose on capital mobility has certainly tightened a little more for Americans. But, the implications are much broader and may well, and possibly should quickly, affect the wealth management decisions of investors worldwide.

In brief, these provisions require that foreign financial institutions (so called FFI´s — and not just banks!) not only withhold 30% of all US source capital flows (remitting the collection promptly back to the US Treasury) but also to disclose the full details of non-exempt accountholders to the US and the IRS. In order to avoid the 30% withholding tax, an FFI would have to agree to become a QFFI (a Qualified Foreign Financial Institution). Of course, under such circumstances, a QFFI must fully report all “non-exempt US accountholders”, i.e. give up any and all client confidentiality against US tax authorities.

A concise and understandable summary of the law is provided by Withers at this link. Let there be no mistake, this latest AMERICAN law may have implications for ALL of us. It may very well affect YOUR portfolio very soon. Therefore, I strongly recommend that ALL Mountaineers study this thoroughly!

So, why on earth would I consider this horrific new law a potential blessing?!?!

The FATCA provisions are draconian. America´s current administration leaves George Bush looking like a whimp. These guys really push a heavy pencil. In fact, these laws are so blatantly coercive and outrageously encumbering for these so-called “Foreign Financial Institutions” (FFIs) that I don´t think they will accept it. In fact, I think there is a considerable chance of an international backlash. And that backlash might well severely impact US financial markets.

After pushing their QI (Qualified Intermediary) rules down the throats of banks worldwide, the US Administration now aims at creating a ‘co-operative´ global network of QFFIs (Qualified Foreign Financial Institutions). In other words, this network of institutions would administer America´s desparate search for tax dollars in every nook and cranny, spying and reporting on their client´s in the interest of squeezing that wealthy taxpayer lemon yet a little harder.

I don´t think this will happen. To use my friend´s words at the beginning of this Update, I believe this law is the straw that breaks the camel´s back. Even if all these FFIs were highly willing and dedicated to supporting America´s wild goose chase, the problem is that they would not know how to do it, and even if they did, they might not be able to afford it.

First of all, these rules are not practicable. For instance, these rules would require a hedge fund with QFFI status to identify on each subscription to the fund whether the ultimate beneficial owner is a ‘US person´. Now, this might be fairly straight-forward in a constellation where the investor is an individual who subscribes directly to the fund. However, what if another fund invests in this fund? And then, what if the investor in the second fund is not an individual but rather a foundation? What if this foundation is held by an international conglomerate of corporations? You get the idea.

Secondly, let´s assume that via the proper standards, procedures and, of course, in conjunction with the required IT systems, FFIs worldwide could in fact fulfill Mr. Obama´s daydreams, most FFIs would not be able to afford it. And many will not be WILLING to afford it.

I´ve discussed this with several top Swiss bankers and legal experts. They all agree that this law leaves many unanswered questions. If indeed the US is hellbound on pushing this through as defined, there will be a backlash, and soon. As stated in our last Update, non-US banks, asset managers, insurance companies, hedge funds and financial advisors may — once and IF the law is implemented as foreseen — very well simply stop investing in US assets altogether.

There´s a world of investment opportunities that are non-US. Why bother with American markets?!?!

Further reading: Peter Macfarlane has also written at length on this topic in edition 54 of The Q Wealth Report, which will be released in the Members Area shortly. If you are not yet a member and would like to find out what you are missing out on, please check our membership benefits page.

Over the last few months and in the wake of the OECD crackdown on tax havens, when talking to my personal consulting clients and handling the free anonymous e-mail consultations we offer to members, I’ve been asked numerous questions about participating in offshore tax amnesty programs like the IRS’s ‘Offshore Voluntary Compliance Program‘ (OVCP), the UK’s ‘New Disclosure Opportunity‘ (NDO) and equivalent programs in many other countries.

Some surprising countries like the Netherlands – including Netherlands Antilles – and Argentina are also getting very agressive with their non-compliant taxpayers and are busy signing Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAs) with offshore havens.

First of all, the usual disclaimers. There is no easy to answer to this question as it depends very much on personal circumstances. International tax lawyers I have talked to are divided in their opinions too. My job here is simply to report what I’m hearing on the offshore grapevine. Nothing here should be construed as tax advice.

The USA  Offshore Voluntary Compliance Program has attracted the severe criticism for being highly ambiguous – even those participating in the amnesty and filing their FBAR forms have received no guarantee that they will not be subject to criminal prosecution later. So, one might ask, what is the benefit of participating in the amnesty? The IRS are effectively saying to taxpayers “you just have to trust us.” Hmm. Any good lawyer will tell you not to trust the opposition. And on that basis many good lawyers have advised clients that it is not in their interests to participate in the amnesty.

Although it has now technically finished, we hear that the IRS may still be offering informal ‘deals’. And the main point of such deals is to collect intelligence on offshore bankers, lawyers, accountants and others who have assisted US taxpayers in tax evasion in the past.

In this regard, I have specifically warned a few clients about undeclared accounts they have in banks that I won’t name in public, but which are likely to be high on the IRS radar. Certain European banks, mainly banks in Switzerland, Austria and Denmark, that I could probably count on the fingers of my two hands, have been very active in the past in terms of marketing their services to Americans. UBS was one of them, but there are others, including some small boutique private banks with mainly American clients.

If the IRS didn’t know about these offshore banks before, they certainly do now. So which banks do you think will be top of the list for auditing with a fine tooth comb once the new QI rules are agreed sometime next year? (More on the new 2010 QI rules coming up shortly in Q Bytes – we are working on that now)

You already know if you are a client of one of these banks or not. In the past, they had representatives travelling worldwide – even to the USA – meeting American clients, often at gatherings frequented by libertarians, banking privacy enthusiasts and the like.

If your hidden account is in a bank with few US clients that has not popped up on the radar, you are undoubtedly in a much more advantageous position. But it’s still not too late to close out your accounts with the affected banks and move assets into a more robust, legally watertight asset protection structure – hopefully including assets that do not trigger reporting requirements (physical gold comes to mind.) By closing such vulnerable accounts as soon as possible, you can minimize (but not eliminate) the risk of detection, since audits should hopefully cover only active accounts.

A second, unstated, purpose of the amnesty programs and the IRS spin machine (press releases etc) is simply to scare people with bluff. A lot of the most productive Americans, who have been the stimulus that brought prosperity, jobs and wealth to their country over past decades, won’t be enjoying a relaxing holiday season this year. We don’t think this is fair, of course.

Although bank secrecy is under attack, it’s certainly not dead yet. On the other hand I’ve been saying for years that it is a BIG MISTAKE to hold unreported bank accounts in your personal name. There are much better ways to legally hide money and protect what is yours. Which are the best offshore banking countries for 2010? We regularly write about such solutions and about the safest and best offshore banks here at Q Wealth Report. We believe in practical, positive advice – not scare tactics.

If you don’t see what you want in our publications, paid-up members are entitled to a free e-mail consultation (subject to the natural limits of my time) and/or to a referral to an expert US tax lawyer we know and recommend based in Panama who can also help with disclosure and amnesty matters.

The IRS have declared the US amnesty a huge success. The UK tax authorities, however, have openly admitted that they are disappointed with the number of people coming through under the NDO. In an effort to attract more, they have extended the deadline through to January 4th.

A separate UK tax amnesty is one negotiated exclusively with Liechtenstein, which it is generally agreed by experts offers very favorable terms to taxpayers. However, only 27 people have come forward so far under this amnesty. From this month, the Liechtenstein disclosure amnesty is being extended to allow UK taxpayers who hold undeclared accounts in other jurisdictions to move those accounts to Liechtenstein and then take advantage of this special amnesty.

Anyway, if you want to be kept informed on this subject it is a regular topic in our weekly Q Bytes newsletter. It is absolutely free, just sign up and confirm your e-mail address. We will not spam you and you can unsubscribe instantly at any time. To sign up to Q Bytes click here.